Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 20-0005
(Conversion Clauses in Contingent Fee Agreements)
Public Comment Form

 
All information submitted is regarded as public record.

Deadline to submit comment is: Tuesday, September 3, 2024

Background

The State Bar Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (COPRAC) is charged with the task of issuing advisory opinions on the ethical propriety of hypothetical attorney conduct. In accordance with applicable State Bar policy and procedure, the committee shall publish proposed formal opinions for public comment (See, State Bar Board of Trustee Resolutions July 1979 and December 2004. See also, Board of Trustee Resolution November 2016).

On May 10, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued an order approving 69 new Rules of Professional Conduct, which will go into effect on November 1, 2018. Information about the new rules is available at the here. Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 20-0005 interprets the new Rules of Professional Conduct.

Discussion/Proposal

Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 20-0005 considers:
Under what circumstances, if any, are “conversion clauses” in contingent fee agreements ethically permissible?
The opinion interprets rules 1.2, 1.5, and 1.16 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California.
 
The opinion digest states: "A conversion clause is a term in any contingent fee agreement, in either a litigation or transactional matter, that provides that, upon termination of the relationship or refusal to settle on terms recommended by an attorney before the happening of the contingent event, the attorney’s fee may convert to an hourly rate or some other calculation other than the original contingent fee. Conversion clauses in contingent fee agreements are ethically prohibited primarily because their use improperly interferes with important client rights, including the client’s right to discharge the attorney or the client’s right to determine whether to settle. Conversion clauses violate an attorney’s ethical duties and may constitute an agreement to charge an unconscionable fee."

At its June 21, 2024, meeting, and in accordance with their procedures, COPRAC tentatively approved Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 20-0005 for a 60-day public comment distribution. This is the second public comment period for this opinion.

Your Information
Commenting on behalf of an organization 🛈

From the choices below, we ask that you indicate your position. (This is a required field.) *